The US just experienced the best market rally for the month of September since 1939. We followed suit. Can this rally keep going? Is a correction inevitable?
Only a fool would rule out a correction or worse at any time. The question I pose is better stated more formally in three parts.
Of course, if the market has legs, the natural question is in which sectors should a long-term investor be set. I address this allocation decision.
Based on the highly technical research behind my analysis, I am reasonably optimistic. Not kick the lights out and let’s party – but neither will I hang out with the party poopers. Solid above-average returns from a solid base gives me comfort.
That being said, the world is coming out of a truly terrible recession; there is an ongoing currency war; protectionism is rearing its ugly head. This scenario doesn’t bode well for a peaceful New Year elsewhere. My focus is Australia.
All of my research is founded on fairly sophisticated quantitative analysis of broking analysts’ forecasts of company earnings and dividends. I add no qualitative overlay. So if the analysts’ forecasts don’t cut the mustard, neither does my translation. I personally know of no better source of company forecasts.
I presented an analysis on SWITZER TV at the end of June 2010 comparing the behaviour of the 2007-2010 bear market and recovery with prior bear markets. There are a couple of postings and a video clip detailing my then views on SWITZER TV.
My thesis was and is simple. There have been 13 bear markets in Australia since records were kept from 1875. Seven of them, including the recent one are visually quite similar. Two, following the Great Depression and the 1973-74 recession, are particularly similar to the 2007-2010 fall and recovery. I plot these data in Chart 1. The only material difference between this chart and the one from the end of June is the addition of the intervening data for July – October.
By my reckoning, we are still on track to follow previously trodden steps. Of course, this pattern does not mean we must follow this path – or even that it is likely – but it does show that if the market does retrace back to level with the 2007 peak within three years, there is nothing unusual about that.
What is more important to me is that if the market does follow my detailed analysis of broker forecasts, the All Ordinaries will bisect the two previous recoveries in Chat 1! Along the way, there are likely to be ups and downs – but monthly averages hide some of these.
I have just completed my construction of my new measure of market mispricing or exuberance. It is now based on the price index and capital gains forecasts rather than the accumulation index and total returns forecasts. I also take the measures back to 2002 using I/B/E/S data in Thomson Reuters Datastream.
2002 was the end of the tech-wreck and 9/11 bear market in the US and the recovery started in March 2003. In this early period, the market was underpriced (Chart 2). The market then fluctuated in short clusters of overpricing and underpricing until the peak of November 2007.
By this analysis, the market was heavily underpriced in 2008/9, which enabled such a strong rally from March 2009. The rally stalled in late 2009 because of the then overpricing. The Greek debt problem and the resources tax contributed to the underpricing and the September 2010 rally wiped out the underpricing. The market is currently neither under or overpriced by a significant amount. Since it seems some exuberance follows underpricing, a small rally could take place even without positive fundamentals.
I use the broker forecasts of dividends and earnings to construct 12-month-ahead forecasts for each sector and the market (Chart 3). When I combine these with my forecasts of volatility and correlation for these sectors, I can produce sector weights for the next three months (Chart 4).
It is normal to introduce bounds on these sector weights so that they cannot deviate too far from the market capitalisation weights that make up the index. I produce expected total returns (including dividends), capital gains, market cap weights and two sets of weights – standard and aggressive. I present only the aggressive weights in Chart 4. Of course the standard and aggressive weights are not appropriate for many investors but they do give an indication of where the collective wisdom of hundreds of broking analysts might consider the way to go.
The usual suspects of energy, materials and industrials (including mining services) appear to have a strong future and attract overweight positions. Consumer staples, consumer discretionary and utilities join them but financials and REITS (property trusts) are the big expected relative underperformers.
The point of this note is not how to set a portfolio. It does show, in my opinion, that a moderately strong set of fundamentals underpin the market – based on a resources boom with a finance sector less buoyant owing to compressed margins.
Numbers without intuition make no sense to me. I see here a coherent story that the rally has legs but corrections will almost certainly occur along the way. My other research (based on my fear and disorder indexes) show that our market is quite settled at the moment and might be able to withstand the buffeting from world markets.
Important information:This content has been prepared without taking account of the objectives, financial situation or needs of any particular individual. It does not constitute formal advice. For this reason, any individual should, before acting, consider the appropriateness of the information, having regard to the individual’s objectives, financial situation and needs and, if necessary, seek appropriate professional advice.
If you liked this article you'll love the Switzer Report, our newsletter and website for trustees of self-managed super funds. Click here for a FREE trial and to hear more of Peter’s expert commentary and advice.