6 April 2020
1300 794 893

Smart young Aussies work out shares can beat property!

Peter Switzer
23 May 2017

By Peter Switzer 

Young Australians are getting into stocks at a faster rate than most of us would expect and, what’s even more surprising, these fast-living, hi-tech, uber cool customers have a pretty conservative attitude to investing!

Could it be that the era they have been brought up with — a very money-educating media one — has rubbed off on a lot of them?

Of course, we’re always noting the differences between generations and it leads to finger pointing and complaints about who has over-enjoyed the spoils of life. Right now, Gen X’ers and even Gen Y’s show some annoyance at baby boomers for their longevity, their going long in investment properties and their luck with low property prices some decades ago.

However, maybe younger generations have turned a threat into a moneymaking opportunity! Experts on shares have often argued that shares are actually better investments than property. Maybe the younger generations might have by default, by their exclusion from buying an expensive home, luckily fallen into an alternative and possibly a better investment option.

Before making my pitch for this outlandish proposition, let me show you the key findings of the Australian Investor Study 2017, which was based on a survey of 4,000 Australians. Here they are:

  • 60% of adult Australians (11.2 million people) hold investments outside their institutional super fund, such as cash, property and on-exchange investments.
  • 37% of adult Australians (6.9 million people) hold investments available through an exchange such as the ASX – up slightly on the 36% from the last survey in 2014.
  • Ownership is higher among men (44%) than women (31%), and greater in metropolitan (40%) than regional areas (32%).
  • Over the last five years, the proportion of 18-24 year-olds investing has doubled from 10% to 20%, and the proportion of 25-34 year-olds has increased from 24% to 39%
  • 15% of adult Australians claim to have an SMSF and 30% of those who don’t are planning to set one up.
  • 81% of investors under 35 seek guaranteed or stable investment returns, while 41% of investors over 55 are comfortable with some variability in their returns.

60% of all investors use some form of professional advice (financial planner, full-service broker, accountant and/or lawyer) to help them make investment decisions, and 45% use some form of financial advice (no accountant or lawyer involved).

Right now, we’re seeing a lot of young Australians remaining at home because they can’t easily buy their own place. Those on good incomes without deposits for a property may be using the share market to build up a decent balance to eventually get into real estate.

Deloitte’s John O’Mahony told me that this makes perfect sense, especially with term deposits offering such low interest rates since the GFC.

That said, the stock market didn’t attract  young Australians 30 years ago and it wasn’t simply because property was relatively cheaper — shares weren’t on their radar screens.

This generation has known the likes of Ross Greenwood, David Koch, Paul Clitheroe and yours truly for most of their lives. Newspapers are full of money lessons. Sky has created a dedicated business and money channel and I even do an On The Money radio show for Talking Lifestyle four afternoons a week.

In the late 1980s, I debuted on Triple M as their moneyman and at FOX FM and 2DAY FM Ross Greenwood was my opposite number. As Charlie Fox, the Triple M program director once said to me: “It’s pretty wild for a place like this to have someone like you working here!”

The world was changing and the cool and groovy parents, who listened to Triple M, had kids who had money stuff thrown at them over breakfast and in the car on the way to school.

Believe it or not, programs such as Money on the Nine Network was a big-rating show and the end-result is a more money savvy group of young Australians.

I’m sure lots of share-investing young Aussies would love to get into property but, as they can’t, they might have realised that there are safe reliable shares, whose values go up over time. They might get shocked when a crash comes along but they might come to know that quality shares, like quality property, pay consistent dividends (just like rent), and their value goes up over time.

This chart of the CBA share price makes the point.  

Source: ASX

Someone who bought at $55 some 10 years ago has had some annoying moments but is still in the money now and has enjoyed nice dividends all that time. At the same time, a property price in Paddington could have dived a lot if it was bought at the height of the market before the GFC.

And, if someone put a million dollars into a good property in January 2009 and another person put a million into the CBA, both could be looking at 200% gains, provided that the property has the same quality as CBA has as a share.

Sure, you can’t live in a CBA share! However, as long as you can live at home with Mum and Dad, quality shares make a lot of sense. Meanwhile, if you’re lucky enough to be in your principal property, quality shares hold their own against investment properties. And best of all, they don’t come with a troublesome tenant!

Young people investing in quality shares, not chasing the speculative punting type stocks, shows a lot of money maturity. I’m proud to have been a part of this, if media money education has played a role, which I’m sure it has.

Click here to sign up for a free 21-day trial to the Switzer Report.

Let us know what you think
Get the latest financial, business, and political expert commentary delivered to your inbox.

When you sign up, we will never give away or sell or barter or trade your email address.

And you can unsubscribe at any time!
1300 794 893
© 2006-2019 Switzer. All Rights Reserved
homephoneenvelopedollargraduation-cap linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram